<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Academic Consults]]></title><description><![CDATA[We create personalized programs to help faculty meet individual and institutional goals for productive scholarship, teaching, and learning. ]]></description><link>https://www.academicconsults.org/blog</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2026 11:52:07 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.academicconsults.org/blog-feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title><![CDATA[What Is Disciplinary Discourse? The Hidden Reason Strong Research Gets Rejected]]></title><description><![CDATA[Disciplinary discourse refers to the field-specific conventions—how arguments are framed, evidence is presented, and significance is signaled—that directly influence whether a manuscript aligns with a journal's expectations and gets accepted. Recognizing these norms matters because methodologically strong papers often get rejected because of tone and structure mismatches rather than substance. If you're a tenure-track faculty member staring down a rejection letter from a top-tier journal, the...]]></description><link>https://www.academicconsults.org/post/what-is-disciplinary-discourse</link><guid isPermaLink="false">6aa4650bd83f50a13adad2ac</guid><pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 20:32:21 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://static.wixstatic.com/media/11062b_fa3ea7788bcf4a44950b7ac69811c19e~mv2.jpg/v1/fit/w_1000,h_1000,al_c,q_80/file.png" length="0" type="image/png"/><dc:creator>carolineleisner</dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[How Tenure-Track Faculty Can Learn Their Field's Unwritten Publishing Rules]]></title><description><![CDATA[How Tenure-Track Faculty Can Learn Their Field's Unwritten Publishing Rules Every discipline has its own unwritten rules for what counts as persuasive academic writing— what researchers call disciplinary discourse. (For a full breakdown of what that means and how it varies across fields, see [What Is Disciplinary Discourse? The Hidden Reason Strong Research Gets Rejected] The harder question for academic writers isn't what these rules are in the abstract. It’s how to learn them, especially...]]></description><link>https://www.academicconsults.org/post/how-to-learn-disciplinary-discourse-tenure-track</link><guid isPermaLink="false">6aa4646a6b6b040961d9a10f</guid><pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 20:29:53 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://static.wixstatic.com/media/11062b_d3a7490815d14a2b84fd0856930b51bb~mv2.jpg/v1/fit/w_1000,h_1000,al_c,q_80/file.png" length="0" type="image/png"/><dc:creator>carolineleisner</dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[The promise of writing in the disciplines]]></title><description><![CDATA[For many of us who teach writing, we often think about the rhetorical triangle: ethos, pathos, and logos. Although, when speaking to our students, colleagues, or peers, we tend to use the more colloquial terms of speaker/writer, audience/reader, and message/content, and then in terms of genre and purpose. Through these terms, I teach writers what good academic writing is and how it works: about how and why we cite sources, use first- or third-person, active voice, even adverbs. I first heard...]]></description><link>https://www.academicconsults.org/post/the-promise-of-writing-in-the-disciplines</link><guid isPermaLink="false">6aa3105f6b6b040961d6d855</guid><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 20:21:53 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://static.wixstatic.com/media/ff6de7_4c13ce14da284c1c998da3a2a097ab7d~mv2.jpeg/v1/fit/w_1000,h_1000,al_c,q_80/file.png" length="0" type="image/png"/><dc:creator>carolineleisner</dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[On plagiarism]]></title><description><![CDATA[Years ago now, when I worked at the Sweetland Writing Center at the University of Michigan, we hosted a large conference called, “Originality, Imitation, and Plagiarism,” to place “plagiarism in dialogue with notions of originality and imitation” (3) [1]. In the years since, as I work with departments to integrate writing across the disciplines and with graduate students and faculty to publish in their fields, I find myself continuing to think about how we can do a better job teaching these...]]></description><link>https://www.academicconsults.org/post/on-plagiarism</link><guid isPermaLink="false">6aa30f2e5462f0629b9a0cca</guid><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 20:14:30 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://static.wixstatic.com/media/ff6de7_c9213b81a9ad418e82f419b2c1a31bfd~mv2.jpeg/v1/fit/w_1000,h_1000,al_c,q_80/file.png" length="0" type="image/png"/><dc:creator>carolineleisner</dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[Take some time away from work to work]]></title><description><![CDATA[We often think of the December-January holiday break as the midpoint of the academic year. Faculty need recuperative time to gear up for the semester or term, for course planning, fine-tuning, or writing syllabi. But, what about your own writing projects? In early December, many of my clients need to step away from their daily writing practice to dive into their grading, with final grade deadlines looming. We talk about scheduling for the first week of January, and then we talk about how it...]]></description><link>https://www.academicconsults.org/post/take-some-time-away-from-work-to-work</link><guid isPermaLink="false">6aa30e08571318e8c9e25935</guid><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 20:09:23 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://static.wixstatic.com/media/ff6de7_f0543bb8b49c4e98956e14e78c9526f7~mv2.jpeg/v1/fit/w_1000,h_1000,al_c,q_80/file.png" length="0" type="image/png"/><dc:creator>carolineleisner</dc:creator></item></channel></rss>